The organisation once referred to publicly as the Rashed Bible became the centre of serious criticism following allegations that its content contained racist rhetoric and anti-Jewish commentary. These concerns prompted widespread alarm and demands for clarification.
Following a formal review and direct discussions with the individual known publicly as Comrade, it has been confirmed that the statements in question were the result of miscommunication and misinterpretation rather than intentional expressions of hate.
After receiving clarification and conducting its own internal assessment, UTAN has officially withdrawn all previous accusations of racism and antisemitism relating to the matter. The organisation has stated that the situation stemmed from misinformation rather than confirmed intent.
UTAN also emphasised the importance of responsible discourse and acknowledged the harm that can arise when serious claims circulate without full verification. It reiterated its commitment to fairness, transparency, and respectful dialogue in public communication.
Both parties have expressed a desire to move forward constructively. No further statements are expected at this time, though UTAN has indicated it may introduce clearer guidelines to prevent similar misunderstandings in the future.
Following a formal review and direct discussions with the individual known publicly as Comrade, it has been confirmed that the statements in question were the result of miscommunication and misinterpretation rather than intentional expressions of hate.
After receiving clarification and conducting its own internal assessment, UTAN has officially withdrawn all previous accusations of racism and antisemitism relating to the matter. The organisation has stated that the situation stemmed from misinformation rather than confirmed intent.
UTAN also emphasised the importance of responsible discourse and acknowledged the harm that can arise when serious claims circulate without full verification. It reiterated its commitment to fairness, transparency, and respectful dialogue in public communication.
Both parties have expressed a desire to move forward constructively. No further statements are expected at this time, though UTAN has indicated it may introduce clearer guidelines to prevent similar misunderstandings in the future.